According to Ipsos Mendelsohn's study of consumers considered to be affluent, "people making at least $100,000 are feeling better about the economy...but the super rich are really feeling better." Fair enough, as they've got reason to feel better: "the good news for the especially affluent is that the top fifth is doing better and better now, while recovery among the hoi-polloi is as flat as a leftover tarp in Zuccotti Park."
Womp womp.
But what does this mean for the notion of 'luxury' today? According to Stephen Kraus, chief research and insights officer at the firm, "Eighty-nine percent of respondents said luxury is in the eye of the beholder. Responses varied widely, but pampering was important. It might be a fish pedicure [don't ask], a two-hour massage, or a facial in a spa in Beaver Creek."
But how different is this than the notion for ANY consumer and the idea of 'value is in the eye of the beholder', where a 'splurge' could be anything from a Starbucks latte or a mani pedi?